Read the top 10 reasons for selecting InetSoft as your BI partner.

Mastic Resin Producer Migrates Reporting from Reach Reporting to InetSoft for Mac Users

A small but growing mastic resin producer serving specialty food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical markets faced a decisive moment in its analytics strategy. Reporting needs had outgrown the lightweight templating and distribution features offered by the incumbent, Reach Reporting, and a new requirement surfaced: the reporting environment had to work seamlessly for a primarily Mac-based workforce. After a careful evaluation, InetSoft’s BI platform was selected to replace Reach Reporting. The migration prioritized cross-platform compatibility, modern web-native dashboards, self-service analytics for non-technical staff, and tighter governance across supply chain and quality-control data. The switch aimed to eliminate platform friction, shorten report delivery cycles, and enable richer, interactive analysis that could be accessed from any Mac device without workarounds.

Business Drivers and User Constraints

The producer’s operations combined traditional harvesting techniques with small-scale industrial processing. Tracking raw resin yield, grading, dryer efficiency, inventory, export documentation, and traceability records generated datasets residing in multiple systems: an ERP, a lightweight harvest-logging application, spreadsheets maintained by quality control, and e-commerce sales data. The reporting team relied heavily on scheduled PDFs and emailed Excel extracts, which created delays and version-control issues. Reach Reporting had provided quick templated financial reports and repeatable exports, but its limitations became apparent when field managers, quality engineers, and sales teams on macOS devices needed interactive, ad-hoc analysis.

Key constraints guided the vendor selection process: no forced Windows-only clients or ActiveX components, strong browser compatibility on macOS (including Safari and Chromium-based browsers), responsive dashboards suitable for MacBook and iPad form factors, and minimal client-side installation or Java dependencies that often cause friction on macOS. Secondary requirements included a capable data mashup layer to join disparate sources, role-based security, and a licensing model that would not balloon as more field users gained access.

Read how InetSoft saves money and resources with deployment flexibility.

Evaluation and Shortlist

A short evaluation period compared several BI offerings against the Mac-first requirements. The incumbent’s strengths — rapid templating and finance-focused exports—remained valued, but the need for interactive visualizations and wider accessibility took priority. The shortlist focused on platforms that offered browser-based UX and server-side rendering so that the Mac environment would not require complex local setup. InetSoft’s web-native architecture and its emphasis on thin-client delivery stood out during hands-on trials because dashboards rendered in-browser without heavy client installations, and visual builders allowed rapid composition of charts and drill paths by non-technical users.

Proof of Concept and Mac-Centric Testing

The proof-of-concept (POC) tested several real-world scenarios critical to the producer’s business: monitoring resin yield by grove and harvest day, cross-referencing grading outcomes with drying times, tracking containerized shipments against customs paperwork, and surfacing quality assurance tests. The POC environment was accessed from multiple Mac devices spanning Safari on macOS, Chrome on macOS, and iPads used by field supervisors. The focus rested on responsiveness, UX parity across browsers, and the ability to embed visualizations within supplier portals and internal dashboards without forcing users to switch to Windows-based tools.

During the POC, non-technical staff used drag-and-drop builders to create ad-hoc reports and pivot views. These demonstrations convinced stakeholders that the new platform would democratize data access without demanding steep technical training. Test users favored the ability to create lightweight, shareable dashboards and to filter interactive visualizations on the fly—capabilities that had been difficult or impossible with the previous reporting tool without producing new static exports.

Migration Planning and Technical Considerations

The migration plan emphasized minimal disruption to ongoing operations and maintaining regulatory traceability during the cutover. The project team created a phased rollout: (1) import and validation of key financial and inventory reports, (2) deployment of operational dashboards for harvest and drying teams, and (3) rollout of embedded supplier and compliance views. Data integration relied on direct connectors to the ERP and secure ingestion of CSV feeds from the harvest-logging application. Attention to timezone alignment, consistent unit conversions for moisture content and weight, and canonical mapping of orchard identifiers were critical to ensuring data integrity.

Because Mac users were central to adoption, the rollout included explicit testing scripts executed on representative Mac hardware. These scripts validated that interactive widgets, drill-through actions, and export functions behaved identically across Safari and Chromium implementations. Mobile responsiveness for iPad field tablets received special attention so supervisors could error-check batch entries and review drying profiles in the field without Wi-Fi-dependent desktop tools.

Learn the advantages of InetSoft's small footprint BI platform.

User Experience and Adoption

Adoption strategy relied on rapid wins. A first-wave dashboard showcased per-grove yield performance alongside drying efficiency and spoilage alerts. The visual layout emphasized clarity: trend lines for moisture content, heat maps for grading distribution, and KPI tiles for shipment readiness. Managers reported that having these views immediately accessible on MacBook laptops during weekly operations reviews changed the cadence of decision-making; previously, data requests required multiple steps and were often delayed by export cycles.

Training emphasized self-service principles and practical examples relevant to each role. Quality control teams learned to build simple filters that isolated batches by drying duration, while sales used interactive timelines to align order fulfilment windows with inventory availability. These workflows reduced reliance on the central reporting team and accelerated response time to anomalies.

Governance, Security, and Compliance

Governance considerations were addressed through role-based access controls and audit trails. Sensitive supplier pricing and contract terms were partitioned from operational dashboards. Mac users received context-appropriate permissions that allowed them to explore production and quality data without exposing financial or contractual records. Audit logs captured report access and data exports to support customs compliance and traceability requirements—important for export markets demanding provenance documentation.

Operational Impact and Measured Outcomes

Within months, measurable improvements surfaced. Report generation and distribution cycles shortened markedly, and field managers used interactive dashboards to preempt drying issues, reducing spoilage. Sales planners aligned promotions with actual inventory views, avoiding overcommitments during peak seasons. The decreased need for manual consolidations freed the finance team to focus on margin analysis rather than routine reconciliations. Importantly, Mac users no longer required virtual machines or clunky workarounds to access enterprise reports, which improved employee satisfaction and lowered IT support tickets related to platform incompatibility.

Learn how InetSoft's data intelligence technology is central to delivering efficient business intelligence.

Reflections on Vendor Choice

The switch away from a templated reporting system toward a web-native BI solution addressed more than a technical mismatch; it corrected a cultural bottleneck. The new environment empowered non-technical Mac users to interrogate data directly, enabling better operational decisions and creating ownership of performance metrics. The vendor selection emphasized pragmatic compatibility and ease-of-use over feature-glut—a choice that aligned well with the producer’s resource constraints and growth trajectory. The migration also clarified that platform neutrality and thin-client delivery confer disproportionate value to organizations with heterogeneous device fleets and geographically dispersed field operations.

Ultimately, the migration delivered a clearer, faster, and more comprehensivereporting environment tailored to the realities of a Mac-forward workforce. The producer gained a reporting foundation that supports future initiatives—predictive yield models, automated quality alerts, and embedded analytics for contract growers—without sacrificing the simplicity and accessibility required by everyday users.