This is the continuation of the transcript on "Top Ten Business Intelligence Mistakes” hosted by InetSoft. The speaker is Christopher Wren, Principal Consultant at TFI Consulting.
Number three has to do with being able to clarify and measure organizational vision. So what happens is all these stupid deliberate words go up on the board. The next step is to take all these deliberate words and just bring them together into some awkward sentence. So after six or eight hours of this nonsense, he ends up with some garbled sentence that says our vision is to be a world class leading edge customer focused producer with value added products and services using engaged employees in a lean six-sigma fashion. Everybody says amen, that looks good to me. Afterwards, everyone’s mentality is I don’t know what the hell it says but it includes my word in it so I like it.
Never have I ever seen a good vision created by a team whose job is to write the vision of a company, the boss, CEO, and the boss’s job. The boss ought to talk to a lot of other people before coming up with a vision but you don’t need a team of 12 really smart and expensive people to try to write a sentence. That’s a recipe for disaster.
So if you get one of these garbled visions to begin with, it is going to be very hard to measure your progress toward it because I don’t know of any world class meters, do you guys? You know guys engage in world class meters, when we’re not even at California class meters.
#1 Ranking: Read how InetSoft was rated #1 for user adoption in G2's user survey-based index | Read More |
So if you need to have clarity in the vision, you first have to know where you are going to go; my vision is work five days a month and pay all my bills. Does everyone understand that? Could you tell whether I did it or not if you checked back with me in five years? Yeah you can. I have a way to measure that but I could say I want to be a world class consultant but that’s a little vague, right? How do you measure that? What does that even mean?
So when you have clarity in your vision then the measures related to that vision become very easy to determine. I see a lot of goals although there may be no way to measure and see their clear vision, but still they have a goal.
I was working with the army corps of engineers and one of their top three goals was improved communication. That sounded like a good one. A lot of people have that one right, we need to improve communication. So I went back to them the next year in their strategic planning and meeting where they reviewed how they did last year and I said, “Well that’s goal number two improved communication. How did we do on that one?” Somebody got up with their PowerPoint and said they started a new website and got 482 hits every month. Then we started the new employee newsletter and started to have an all hands meeting with the CEO every quarter. Somebody then asked, “well did we improve communication or not?” Nobody knew.
So they had this goal, which was improved communication, and the only measure of it is we had a lot of activity, we were very, very busy doing all these things but they didn’t really know if they improved communication or not. So you have to have a measure for your vision, for your strategies, for your goals, and for your objectives. You have to have a way of measuring whether or not these things actually produce what you are intending them to produce.
So go through and look at all these things in your strategic plan, your goals, your objectives, your vision, and your mission and say, is everything linked together, do I have measures for all these things, or there are some disconnects there.
![]() |
Read the top 10 reasons for selecting InetSoft as your BI partner. |
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) monitors Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to evaluate performance in military construction, civil works, and environmental sustainability. These metrics ensure alignment with its mission to deliver engineering solutions, reduce disaster risks, and support economic growth. Below are key KPIs drawn from USACE’s sustainability reports and operational objectives.
Measures the reduction in energy consumption per square foot across USACE facilities, targeting efficiency improvements. The 2020 Sustainability Report noted a 35% reduction since 2003, reflecting progress in energy-efficient infrastructure. This KPI supports cost savings and environmental goals.
Tracks the percentage decrease in water consumption across USACE projects and facilities. A 12% further reduction was reported in 2020, building on a 32% decrease from 2008. This metric ensures sustainable resource management in civil works like reservoirs and navigation.
Evaluates the percentage of new projects meeting LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) standards, particularly silver certification. In 2008, 78% of projects met this standard, though short of the 100% goal. This KPI drives sustainable construction practices.
Monitors the production and management of hazardous waste, with a noted 35% increase in 2008, indicating a challenge area. Effective tracking ensures compliance with environmental regulations and minimizes ecological impact. USACE aims to reduce this through improved processes.
Assesses the percentage of projects completed on schedule, critical for military construction and civil works like flood control systems. Timely delivery ensures public safety and economic benefits. USACE prioritizes this to meet federal mandates and stakeholder expectations.
Measures project costs against budgets, especially for high-priority initiatives funded by appropriations like the $6.8 billion in 2018. This KPI ensures fiscal responsibility and maximizes taxpayer value. It’s critical for large-scale disaster recovery and infrastructure projects.
Evaluates the effectiveness of flood control projects, such as dams and levees, in reducing flood damage risks. Metrics include the number of protected properties and reduced economic losses. This aligns with USACE’s civil works mission to enhance community resilience.
Tracks the operational availability of locks, dams, and dredged waterways to support commercial navigation. High uptime ensures efficient transport and economic activity. USACE monitors this to maintain navigable waterways critical to trade.
Measures the impact of aquatic ecosystem restoration projects, such as wetland recovery, through metrics like restored acreage or biodiversity improvement. This KPI supports USACE’s environmental mission under the Clean Water Act. Success is gauged by ecological health and compliance.
Assesses the speed and accuracy of environmental permitting processes, such as those under the Clean Water Act Section 404. In 2025, USACE fast-tracked over 600 energy projects, emphasizing streamlined approvals. This KPI balances regulatory compliance with project acceleration.
These KPIs reflect USACE’s commitment to sustainability, fiscal responsibility, and mission success in engineering and environmental stewardship. Tools like those from InetSoft could enhance tracking by integrating data from diverse sources for real-time insights. Regular monitoring ensures USACE meets its goals for national security, economic vitality, and disaster risk reduction.
Previous: Lack of Measuring Ethics and Corporate Culture |