Choosing InetSoft StyleBI Over Slemma
When deciding which Business Intelligence (BI) software is best, the choice may be rather difficult, especially with so many options. In addition to experts and thought leaders in the field, reading reviews written by everyday users of a particular BI platform is a great way to help narrow the decision.
When recently placed head to head in ratings by research firm G2 Crowd, InetSoft outranked BI provider Slemma in a majority of categories. This page will provide a breakdown of the various categories in which InetSoft outranked Slemma.
A good BI platform will provide business users with an intuitive, easy-to-read, easy-to-use tool for monitoring their activities. When visual analytics are created properly the users are treated to highly balanced visualizations and data to enable the objectives of the organization. The Rating section of the G2 Crowd endorses just that, where InetSoft won over Slemma in Meets Requirements, Ease of Use, Ease of Doing Business With, and Product Direction.
InetSoft outranked Slemma in 20 out of 28 categories, which comes as no surprise as InetSoft's core objective is to implement BI software in an effortless and trouble-free way.
A Slemma Alternative with Better Self-Service
To maximize competitiveness, enterprises have to adopt ways in which business users can quickly and easily get the required information. This can be made possible only when business users can get rich, right, and real information as easily as they get information from a Google search. The G2 Crowd reviews rated InetSoft StyleBI higher than Slemma as it helps enterprises achieve their goals with a maximum self-service mission.
In the category of Self Service, InetSoft won over Slemma in every single category: Calculated Fields, Data Column Filtering, Data Discovery, Search, Collaboration/Workflow, and Automodeling. InetSoft's BI product eliminates inordinate delay in decision-making and extra dependencies on IT. This has reduced the overall cost of business intelligence resulting in lower operating costs, increased productivity, higher customer satisfaction, and most importantly a better climate among employees of an organization - both in IT and in the business.
The unique data mashup feature of StyleBI makes it possible to combine any type of data into one visualization. Users create data mashups through InetSoft's data block, enabling fields from different data sources to be joined together in a Lego-like block fashion, with a few clicks of a mouse. Advantages like these are what brought InetSoft winning ratings in Data Transformation, WYSIWYG Report Design, and Integration API's under the Building Reports category.
List of Parameters where InetSoft was Evaluated Higher than Slemma
The detailed list of categories & parameters where InetSoft StyleBI scored over Slemma is presented below. Please click here or the G2 logo to go over the individual reviews.
- Meets Requirements
- Ease of Use
- Ease of Doing Business With
- Product Direction (% positive)
- Customization
- User, Role, and Access Management
- Internationalization
- Sandbox / Test Environments
- Performance and Reliability
- Calculated Fields
- Data Column Filtering
- Data Discovery
- Search
- Collaboration/Workflow
- Automodeling
- Data Transformation
- Data Modeling
- WYSIWYG Report Design
- Integration APIs
- Steps to Answer
- Score Cards
- Data Visualization
- Big Data Services
InetSoft Strengthens Information Delivery and Analysis of an Enterprise
InetSoft was also found to be better in the Report category, in Big Data Services and in the Advanced Analytics category. These real G2 Crowd ratings showcase InetSoft's strength for delivering information and analysis. StyleBI software uses a visual approach to build reports and visualizations, allowing complex views to be built with a simple drag and drop user interface. Once IT has completed the initial steps of defining data sources, business users can create their own worksheets, which contain combined fields from multiple data sources.
InetSoft's software can run on Windows, Mac, and Linux, and can also be accessed remotely from any workplace. InetSoft exceeded Slemma in Sandbox/Test Environments, and User, Role and Access Management, Performance and Reliability, Internationalization, and Customization.
InetSoft helps Automate Business Monitoring and Management
As an enterprise grows, so does its need for report making software that will automate business monitoring and management. Better sales numbers, more salespeople, more clients and accounts to manage also means more products to ship and track, more employee information to file, and more daily variables to react to.
InetSoft designed StyleBI is a responsive, effortless, report making BI platform that helps an enterprise build informative reports immediately. Its dashboard systems user interface allows for the production of intricate affiliation and performance metrics in a simple to understand and easy process. This greatly reduces the learning curve for all those involved while still providing an effective means of expressing important data. InetSoft offers the most efficient tool to help business users reach that end and meet the needs of companies of any size and industry.
Comparison: StyleBI vs Slemma
Overview & positioning
StyleBI is a full-featured web-based BI platform emphasizing self-service, data mashup capability, and embedding/white-label scenarios. It targets both enterprise users and ISVs/embedded analytics use-cases.
Slemma is positioned more toward small to mid-size businesses and start-ups, with cloud deployment, drag-and-drop dashboards, and an emphasis on ease of use and quick value.
Strengths
- StyleBI:
- Strong data-mashup engine: ability to combine disparate sources, create virtual joins, and support self-service data blending.
- Embedding and OEM/white-label capability: built for integration into other applications, multi-tenant, API-driven.
- Enterprise-power features: role-based security, scalability, support for large datasets.
- Slemma:
- Ease of use: intuitive drag-and-drop, quick setup, cloud-based so minimal infrastructure.
- Integration out-of-the-box: many connectors and data sources ready, suitable for rapid deployment.
- Cost-effective for smaller teams: pricing geared for smaller user counts, simpler model.
Weaknesses / limitations
- StyleBI:
- Potential learning curve and complexity for non-technical or business users; some require training.
- Although self-service is emphasized, the breadth of enterprise features might require more IT or analytic governance effort.
- Slemma:
- Customization, advanced analytics, and deeper modeling capabilities are weaker compared with more enterprise BI platforms.
- Some connectivity or integration gaps in complex or on-premise data scenarios; support experiences can vary.
Target audience & ideal use cases
StyleBI is best suited for organizations that require embedded analytics or OEM use, significant self-service capability across many data sources, enterprise scale or multi-tenant analytics, and want greater control over deployment. It also suits scenarios where IT or analytics teams are comfortable managing richer platforms.
Slemma is best for smaller teams, start-ups, or businesses that prioritize rapid deployment, simpler dashboards, lower overhead, and cloud-first analytics without heavy infrastructure or modeling demands. It may be less suitable for very large data volumes or highly complex analytics needs.
Cost & licensing considerations
Slemma publishes clear tiered pricing for cloud deployment with per-user limits and embedded/white-label options.
StyleBI emphasizes cost savings through open architecture, embedding flexibility, and lower total cost of ownership when compared with large enterprise BI stacks; however, detailed per-user/licensing pricing is less public in simple tiers.
How to decide between them (key questions to ask)
- How many users will build and consume dashboards, and what is the mix between business users versus analytics/IT users?
- What is the variety and complexity of data sources? Does the environment require heavy mashup, complex transformations, and governance?
- Is embedded analytics within another application, portal, or multi-tenant model a requirement?
- What is the acceptable trade-off between speed of adoption versus depth of capability?
- What budget and licensing model fits the organization? For smaller teams, Slemma may be more cost-effective; for large roll-out, StyleBI may provide long-term savings.
Both tools serve legitimate BI needs, but with distinct positioning. StyleBI presents a more robust, enterprise-capable platform suited for organizations that anticipate growth, embedding, or diverse data sources and governance needs. Slemma offers a more streamlined, approachable platform ideal for smaller teams, quicker roll-out, and straightforward dashboard/reporting needs.
If the priority is to get dashboards up fast with minimal overhead, Slemma may be the faster path. If requirements include many users, multiple data sources, embedding capability, and future growth, StyleBI could offer a more future-proof investment.